Home liberachat/#haskell: Logs Calendar

Logs: liberachat/#haskell

←Prev  Next→
Page 1 .. 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 .. 18037
— 1,803,602 events total
2021-07-26 12:55:45 <arkanoid> I'm studying an introduction to algebraic data types. I've a question: what's the point of writing the last line like that instead of just "emptyBoard = TicTacToe2 Nothing"? https://termbin.com/3os5
2021-07-26 12:56:24 <Taneb> arkanoid: the advantage is that it typechecks
2021-07-26 12:56:37 → Topsi joins (~Tobias@dyndsl-037-138-065-137.ewe-ip-backbone.de)
2021-07-26 12:56:44 <Taneb> "const $ const Nothing" is of type a -> b -> Maybe a (here, Three -> Three -> Maybe Bool)
2021-07-26 12:56:53 <Taneb> Whereas "Nothing" is just of type Maybe a
2021-07-26 12:57:12 <Taneb> That first one should end with Maybe c, not Maybe a, sorry
2021-07-26 12:58:37 × peterhil quits (~peterhil@mobile-access-5d6af6-209.dhcp.inet.fi) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-07-26 12:58:59 × gehmehgeh quits (~user@user/gehmehgeh) (Quit: Leaving)
2021-07-26 12:59:10 → gehmehgeh joins (~user@user/gehmehgeh)
2021-07-26 12:59:19 → jolly joins (~jolly@208.180.97.158)
2021-07-26 12:59:40 <arkanoid> thanks!
2021-07-26 12:59:43 <arkanoid> makes sense
2021-07-26 13:00:27 × jippiedoe quits (~david@2a02-a44c-e14e-1-71e9-bb56-c41b-9e9d.fixed6.kpn.net) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:00:32 × derelict quits (~derelict@user/derelict) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:00:42 × dunkeln quits (~dunkeln@94.129.69.87) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:01:04 → jippiedoe joins (~david@77-171-152-62.fixed.kpn.net)
2021-07-26 13:01:08 → alx741 joins (~alx741@186.178.108.3)
2021-07-26 13:03:00 × jneira quits (~jneira@212.8.115.226) (Quit: Client closed)
2021-07-26 13:03:44 × Obo quits (~roberto@70.pool90-171-81.dynamic.orange.es) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:04:04 → peterhil joins (~peterhil@mobile-access-5d6af6-209.dhcp.inet.fi)
2021-07-26 13:07:25 <arkanoid> is there any difference in writing "data TicTacToe2 a = TicTacToe2 { board :: Three -> Three -> a}" and "data TicTacToe2 a = TicTacToe Three -> Three -> a" apart the generated "board" get function?
2021-07-26 13:07:50 <arkanoid> forget a "2" on second TicTacToe
2021-07-26 13:09:14 → eggplantade joins (~Eggplanta@108-201-191-115.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net)
2021-07-26 13:09:33 <Taneb> There's a few more minor differences, you get the record syntax with the first one, so you could write "TicTacToe2 { board = const $ const Nothing }" for example
2021-07-26 13:10:06 × Kaipi quits (~Kaiepi@nwcsnbsc03w-47-54-173-93.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:10:07 × anandprabhu quits (~anandprab@94.202.243.198) (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
2021-07-26 13:10:19 → Kaiepi joins (~Kaiepi@nwcsnbsc03w-47-54-173-93.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net)
2021-07-26 13:10:57 → LukeHoersten joins (~LukeHoers@user/lukehoersten)
2021-07-26 13:11:24 → curiousgay joins (~curiousga@77-120-186-48.kha.volia.net)
2021-07-26 13:11:41 <arkanoid> thanks
2021-07-26 13:12:53 × hendursa1 quits (~weechat@user/hendursaga) (Quit: hendursa1)
2021-07-26 13:13:24 → hendursaga joins (~weechat@user/hendursaga)
2021-07-26 13:14:05 × eggplantade quits (~Eggplanta@108-201-191-115.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:16:21 → slowButPresent joins (~slowButPr@user/slowbutpresent)
2021-07-26 13:16:30 × merijn quits (~merijn@83-160-49-249.ip.xs4all.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:17:25 → derelict joins (~derelict@user/derelict)
2021-07-26 13:18:12 → Obo joins (~roberto@70.pool90-171-81.dynamic.orange.es)
2021-07-26 13:18:48 <Cajun> im reading the same book atm, is there a benefit to record syntax? when i was learning haskell from Programming in Haskell, record syntax was never mentioned, so it always seems unnatural. is it just cleaner?
2021-07-26 13:21:52 → Bayes joins (~Bayes@ics177-97.icsincorporated.com)
2021-07-26 13:21:58 × chris_ quits (~chris@81.96.113.213) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-07-26 13:22:08 × Bayes quits (~Bayes@ics177-97.icsincorporated.com) (Changing host)
2021-07-26 13:22:08 → Bayes joins (~Bayes@user/bayes)
2021-07-26 13:23:18 <Cajun> is it just more for your money (you get record syntax), or does it have more of a benefit?
2021-07-26 13:23:34 <juri_> I actually find it dirtier, as it creates accessor functions by default, which can be.. poorly named.
2021-07-26 13:23:54 <jippiedoe> It's a way to name fields, so if you ever find yourself with a datatype `Data Foo = Foo Bool Bool Bool` it might be better to use record syntax to name all of those. Ofcourse, you can often sidestep the issue with better datatype design!
2021-07-26 13:23:57 <juri_> in a project i inherited, i had an accessor function for 'x' and 'y'. bad.
2021-07-26 13:24:55 × gehmehgeh quits (~user@user/gehmehgeh) (Quit: Leaving)
2021-07-26 13:25:24 <arkanoid> does it make any sense to use record syntax for a data type with just 1 type, like the aforementioned example?
2021-07-26 13:27:38 × jiribenes quits (~jiribenes@rosa.jiribenes.com) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:29:17 × fossdd quits (~fossdd@sourcehut/user/fossdd) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:30:03 → fossdd joins (~fossdd@sourcehut/user/fossdd)
2021-07-26 13:31:04 <arthurxavierx> At work we've tried a lot of stuff and settled down on using DuplicateRecordFields, RecordWildCards and generic-lens (but HasField from GHC.Records works just fine as well). We don't prefix record accessors and only use RecordWildCards when constructing or destructing records in a sufficiently narrow scope. To access fields in other contexts we use `getField @"fieldName"`. This approach has been working very well IMO.
2021-07-26 13:31:51 <arthurxavierx> although I'd find it easier on the eye if we used OverloadedLabels to have it look like IHP's `get #fieldName`
2021-07-26 13:33:03 → jao joins (~jao@cpc103048-sgyl39-2-0-cust502.18-2.cable.virginm.net)
2021-07-26 13:33:51 → jiribenes joins (~jiribenes@rosa.jiribenes.com)
2021-07-26 13:34:46 <jippiedoe> arkanoid: For newtypes, it's a common style to write `newtype Foo = Foo { runFoo :: _ }`, but it only really saves 1 line of defining runFoo yourself. Small benefit is that (I think) you import `runFoo` for free with `Foo(..)`
2021-07-26 13:36:23 × curiousgay quits (~curiousga@77-120-186-48.kha.volia.net) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:36:59 × andreabedini quits (~andreabed@ec2-3-25-98-120.ap-southeast-2.compute.amazonaws.com) (Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat)
2021-07-26 13:37:45 → andreabedini joins (~andreabed@ec2-3-25-98-120.ap-southeast-2.compute.amazonaws.com)
2021-07-26 13:39:54 <yushyin> juri_: NoFieldSelectors to the rescue https://ghc.gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/doc/users_guide/exts/field_selectors.html#extension-FieldSelectors
2021-07-26 13:41:14 × LukeHoersten quits (~LukeHoers@user/lukehoersten) (Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2021-07-26 13:42:41 → chris_ joins (~chris@81.96.113.213)
2021-07-26 13:45:59 <arthurxavierx> yushyin: do you know if NoFieldSelectors have any weird interaction with RecordWildCards?
2021-07-26 13:49:51 <yushyin> arthurxavierx: i don't know for sure, but it should work just fine since the fields are still available. (it's only the selector functions that are no longer generated)
2021-07-26 13:50:12 <arthurxavierx> hm that makes sense. thanks!
2021-07-26 13:50:40 → zebrag joins (~chris@user/zebrag)
2021-07-26 13:56:57 <arkanoid> thanks
2021-07-26 13:58:02 × jippiedoe quits (~david@77-171-152-62.fixed.kpn.net) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2021-07-26 13:58:49 <nshepperd2> iirc the selector functions are actually generated, they're just made inaccessible in the top level namespace
2021-07-26 13:58:50 × ystael quits (~ystael@user/ystael) (Quit: Lost terminal)
2021-07-26 14:00:22 × fossdd quits (~fossdd@sourcehut/user/fossdd) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2021-07-26 14:01:26 → fossdd joins (~fossdd@sourcehut/user/fossdd)
2021-07-26 14:01:40 → ystael joins (~ystael@user/ystael)
2021-07-26 14:03:13 × derelict quits (~derelict@user/derelict) (Quit: WeeChat 3.2)
2021-07-26 14:05:48 → merijn joins (~merijn@83-160-49-249.ip.xs4all.nl)
2021-07-26 14:06:55 <yushyin> even that might be the case, yes, i should not have assumed this without knowing the implementation
2021-07-26 14:07:46 → Sgeo joins (~Sgeo@user/sgeo)
2021-07-26 14:08:28 → LukeHoersten joins (~LukeHoers@user/lukehoersten)
2021-07-26 14:09:29 × Vajb quits (~Vajb@hag-jnsbng11-58c3a1-224.dhcp.inet.fi) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-07-26 14:10:07 → Vajb joins (~Vajb@2001:999:62:1d53:26b1:6c9b:c1ed:9c01)
2021-07-26 14:10:25 → enoq joins (~enoq@194-208-179-35.lampert.tv)
2021-07-26 14:10:31 → jippiedoe joins (~david@77-171-152-62.fixed.kpn.net)
2021-07-26 14:10:32 × acidjnk_new quits (~acidjnk@p200300d0c72b9530a5bcc5cf9bf6f5b6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2021-07-26 14:11:08 × merijn quits (~merijn@83-160-49-249.ip.xs4all.nl) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
2021-07-26 14:13:11 × chris_ quits (~chris@81.96.113.213) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-07-26 14:13:16 → lavaman joins (~lavaman@98.38.249.169)
2021-07-26 14:16:55 × zaquest quits (~notzaques@5.128.210.178) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-07-26 14:18:03 → chris_ joins (~chris@81.96.113.213)
2021-07-26 14:18:24 × lavaman quits (~lavaman@98.38.249.169) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2021-07-26 14:18:32 → zaquest joins (~notzaques@5.128.210.178)
2021-07-26 14:19:01 × jippiedoe quits (~david@77-171-152-62.fixed.kpn.net) (Quit: Leaving)
2021-07-26 14:19:05 → wroathe joins (~wroathe@c-68-54-25-135.hsd1.mn.comcast.net)
2021-07-26 14:19:10 → neceve joins (~quassel@2a02:c7f:607e:d600:f762:20dd:304e:4b1f)
2021-07-26 14:22:29 × chris_ quits (~chris@81.96.113.213) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2021-07-26 14:22:57 → chris_ joins (~chris@81.96.113.213)
2021-07-26 14:23:52 × andreabedini quits (~andreabed@ec2-3-25-98-120.ap-southeast-2.compute.amazonaws.com) (Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat)
2021-07-26 14:24:41 × xff0x quits (~xff0x@2001:1a81:523c:b300:f2c1:fc0d:e213:d303) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2021-07-26 14:25:21 → xff0x joins (~xff0x@2001:1a81:523c:b300:334f:584b:1868:61b3)
2021-07-26 14:27:52 <raehik1> Is it possible to use Happy in a context-sensitive manner, eg have two rules where the expansions are the same(/similar), but the correct one can be selected by checking some state somewhere?
2021-07-26 14:28:36 <raehik1> Not a language design question, it's a pre-existing language that's known for being horrible for parsing
←Prev  Next→
Page 1 .. 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 .. 18037

All times are in UTC.