Home liberachat/#haskell: Logs Calendar

Logs: liberachat/#haskell

←Prev  Next→ 1,801,587 events total
2025-12-11 16:35:22 × bggd_ quits (~bgg@2a01:e0a:fd5:f510:fb9e:194f:f1d5:eb88) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-12-11 16:40:12 spew_ joins (~spew@user/spew)
2025-12-11 16:40:43 × spew quits (~spew@user/spew) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2025-12-11 16:41:15 × merijn quits (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2025-12-11 16:41:16 spew_ is now known as spew
2025-12-11 16:41:35 <haskellbridge> <matti palli> Right. At the moment there is no distinction, and thinking about it might be that typechecking levels could be an issue, i.e. when do you unify with a hole type variable in the new schema
2025-12-11 16:41:38 <haskellbridge> interesting problem for sure
2025-12-11 16:42:20 × karenw quits (~karenw@user/karenw) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-12-11 16:43:45 × tv quits (~tv@user/tv) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-12-11 16:45:02 <dolio> Even if you know the provenance of type variables, I don't know that the further idea makes sense.
2025-12-11 16:45:17 merijn joins (~merijn@77.242.116.146)
2025-12-11 16:46:36 yin is now known as zero
2025-12-11 16:46:40 zero is now known as yin
2025-12-11 16:49:55 × merijn quits (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2025-12-11 16:53:17 Guest87 joins (~Guest87@2405:201:d006:986f:5c73:3a20:69d:7d07)
2025-12-11 17:02:14 merijn joins (~merijn@77.242.116.146)
2025-12-11 17:08:13 × skum quits (~skum@user/skum) (Quit: WeeChat 4.8.1)
2025-12-11 17:08:27 milan joins (~milan@88.212.61.169)
2025-12-11 17:08:35 × merijn quits (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2025-12-11 17:09:49 <milan> Guyz Am I out of luck if I want to use Data.Text in application build with -XSafe?
2025-12-11 17:10:47 × spew quits (~spew@user/spew) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-12-11 17:12:55 Tuplanolla joins (~Tuplanoll@91-152-225-194.elisa-laajakaista.fi)
2025-12-11 17:13:09 spew joins (~spew@user/spew)
2025-12-11 17:15:42 Googulator87 joins (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-01cb-8583-2a78-a55c-bee5.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-12-11 17:15:45 × trickard_ quits (~trickard@cpe-83-98-47-163.wireline.com.au) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2025-12-11 17:15:58 trickard_ joins (~trickard@cpe-83-98-47-163.wireline.com.au)
2025-12-11 17:17:13 tv joins (~tv@user/tv)
2025-12-11 17:18:27 Googulator87 is now known as Googulator
2025-12-11 17:20:30 merijn joins (~merijn@77.242.116.146)
2025-12-11 17:21:59 × chele quits (~chele@user/chele) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-12-11 17:25:13 × merijn quits (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-12-11 17:33:31 tzh joins (~tzh@c-76-115-131-146.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
2025-12-11 17:36:23 × tromp quits (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:dd4:56d:fd02:60e2) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2025-12-11 17:36:36 × spew quits (~spew@user/spew) (Quit: nyaa~)
2025-12-11 17:37:14 spew joins (~spew@user/spew)
2025-12-11 17:37:25 merijn joins (~merijn@77.242.116.146)
2025-12-11 17:39:29 × gmg quits (~user@user/gehmehgeh) (Remote host closed the connection)
2025-12-11 17:41:14 × kuribas quits (~user@ip-188-118-57-242.reverse.destiny.be) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-12-11 17:42:19 × merijn quits (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2025-12-11 17:45:07 tccq joins (~user@user/tccq)
2025-12-11 17:46:33 <gentauro> I'm tryiing to build an old stack/cabal project, but I'm getting: `startProcess: posix_spawnp: does not exist`. Have anybody seen that before?
2025-12-11 17:46:45 <gentauro> *note*: I have the newest stack installed
2025-12-11 17:47:15 <gentauro> `Version 3.7.1, Git revision`
2025-12-11 17:48:35 × Googulator quits (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-01cb-8583-2a78-a55c-bee5.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-12-11 17:48:51 Googulator joins (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-01cb-8583-2a78-a55c-bee5.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-12-11 17:54:00 merijn joins (~merijn@77.242.116.146)
2025-12-11 17:54:35 skum joins (~skum@user/skum)
2025-12-11 17:54:40 × ephemient quits (uid407513@user/ephemient) (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
2025-12-11 17:55:21 <sm> gentauro: doesn't ring a bell, but have you tried searching for that error message ?
2025-12-11 17:55:58 int-e would look for verbosity options or maybe use strace to figure out what program it's trying to execute
2025-12-11 17:56:28 <sm> anything at https://github.com/haskell/process/issues/247 ?
2025-12-11 17:56:38 <geekosaur> normally it says the program
2025-12-11 17:57:37 <gentauro> sm: it seems that the cached `Cabal-simple-…` placed in `~/.stack/setup-exe-cache/x86_64-linux-nix` become wacko. I cleansed that folder and now it works.
2025-12-11 17:57:51 kuribas joins (~user@2a02:1808:cd:df9d:1dcb:cff3:20e8:95d8)
2025-12-11 17:58:08 <gentauro> geekosaur: yeah, it mentioned `Cabal-simple-…`
2025-12-11 17:58:17 × merijn quits (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
2025-12-11 17:58:44 <int-e> (note that "not found" in an exec-like context doesn't necessarily mean that the executable itself is missing; it can also be a shared library that it depends on)
2025-12-11 17:59:01 <gentauro> I guess it happens from time to time on NixOS when I change the main channel (recently moved from 25.05 -> 25.11)
2025-12-11 17:59:32 <int-e> oh I suppose nix will change library paths all the time
2025-12-11 18:00:06 <int-e> anyway, it sunds like the issue is solved :)
2025-12-11 18:00:20 <gentauro> int-e: and sometimes remove support for old GHC. They do that cos the burden of maintaining all of it. So I do understand.
2025-12-11 18:00:28 <gentauro> int-e: it sure is. Thx :)
2025-12-11 18:00:46 × Googulator quits (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-01cb-8583-2a78-a55c-bee5.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-12-11 18:00:49 Googulator24 joins (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-01cb-8583-2a78-a55c-bee5.pool6.digikabel.hu)
2025-12-11 18:00:57 <sm> gentauro: great. I guess "nuke things and start over" is our equivalent of "have you tried turning it off and on again"
2025-12-11 18:01:10 <gentauro> sm: xD
2025-12-11 18:01:21 <sm> sometimes it's the quickest thing to try
2025-12-11 18:01:40 <gentauro> sm: back in the good old days, I sed gentoo and compiled it all locally. I'm never going back to those days again xD
2025-12-11 18:01:57 <gentauro> I would rather spend my time producing code ;)
2025-12-11 18:02:47 <haskellbridge> <sm> sure, but sometimes it's quicker to move some dirs aside and let cabal/stack run in another window while you continue working on things that require thought
2025-12-11 18:02:56 <geekosaur> if that binary was left over from then, it might do it. "does not exist" can refer not to the binary, but to its ELF "interpreter" whose path might vary on different systems (well, shouldn't these days, but if it was old enough it might)
2025-12-11 18:03:27 <geekosaur> leading to confusing error messages because `exec` has no way to pass back precisely what wasn't found
2025-12-11 18:03:37 <haskellbridge> <sm> (not something I would do often, but sometimes the dumb hands-free test is worth doing)
2025-12-11 18:03:47 <geekosaur> in particular, it varies on NixOS
2025-12-11 18:03:55 <geekosaur> see `patchelf`
2025-12-11 18:04:09 × Guest87 quits (~Guest87@2405:201:d006:986f:5c73:3a20:69d:7d07) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-12-11 18:05:20 <haskellbridge> <sm> I guess my point is, as we work with computers and tools we are working with very complex state which will never be entirely bug free, sometimes it's more cost effective to try a state reset than to debug what's going wrong
2025-12-11 18:06:33 × Googulator24 quits (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-01cb-8583-2a78-a55c-bee5.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed)
2025-12-11 18:06:43 peterbecich joins (~Thunderbi@71.84.33.135)
2025-12-11 18:06:45 tromp joins (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:dd4:56d:fd02:60e2)
2025-12-11 18:06:55 Googulator24 joins (~Googulato@87-97-86-146.pool.digikabel.hu)
2025-12-11 18:07:18 Googulator24 is now known as Googulator
2025-12-11 18:09:19 × Square quits (~Square4@user/square) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2025-12-11 18:09:21 <gentauro> haskellbridge: that's actually the foundation of Erlang right? We know we are gonna fail at some point, lets add that to the equation.
2025-12-11 18:10:23 <EvanR> well, transactional semantics are a good way to deal with that assumption
2025-12-11 18:10:38 <EvanR> which is not what erlang is usually promoting
2025-12-11 18:11:05 <haskellbridge> <sm> I know php is a good example, you get a fresh state every request
2025-12-11 18:11:46 merijn joins (~merijn@77.242.116.146)
2025-12-11 18:11:49 <haskellbridge> <sm> that's running software rather than dev in process, but you know what I mean
2025-12-11 18:12:01 <haskellbridge> <sm> same principle
2025-12-11 18:12:45 <haskellbridge> <sm> I haven't used erlang, but yes that sounds right, they like to throw something away if it fails
2025-12-11 18:14:31 <haskellbridge> <Morj> I've been learning erlang recently, and haven't seen anything about transactional semantics. Sad
2025-12-11 18:14:39 <EvanR> ;_;
2025-12-11 18:14:44 <haskellbridge> <Morj> Sadder still is that I thought I finished learning
2025-12-11 18:15:06 <Rembane> Finally max level!
2025-12-11 18:15:27 ft joins (~ft@p508db844.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
2025-12-11 18:15:58 <EvanR> level 60, you're done
2025-12-11 18:16:10 <EvanR> return to the world
2025-12-11 18:18:46 × sord937 quits (~sord937@gateway/tor-sasl/sord937) (Quit: sord937)
2025-12-11 18:28:50 target_i joins (~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099)

All times are in UTC.